IRTalk.com - A Service of the Snell Group
Welcome to IRTalk.com Sign in | Join | Help
in Search

Cold weather specifications

Last post 03-08-2010, 5:28 PM by John Snell. 2 replies.
Sort Posts: Previous Next
  •  03-08-2010, 7:33 AM 4322

    Cold weather specifications

    Attachment: Noisy image.jpg

    Many people ask us about how cold it can be and still have an imaging system do a good job. Even though we are nearing the end of winter, I wanted to address this as it has come up often in the past few weeks while I was at RESNET and other building-related conferences. 

    Two specifications are often given for an imaging system, operating temperature and measurement range. The first describes the temperatures in which the system can be reliably used, typically -15C (5F) or lower. I don't know exactly how this lower temperature is determined but I can tell you I've used systems rated like this at much lower temperatures. If I ever had a concern, I'd simply wrap the imager in some sort of insulating blanket. It has always continued to operate longer than I, the operator, could continue to operate!

    The measurement range is defines the range of temperatures for which the radiometric calibration holds true. Temperatures can typically be measured outside this range, and usually quite accurately, the the manufacturer will not guarantee they meet the specified accuracy.

    The bigger problem for any infrared system, especially the microbolometers that make up the vast majority of today's systems, is that they may not perform well at low temperatures because of reduced sensitivity. There is less radiation at lower temperatures. When I'm out at -30C (-22F) or lower (see attached), I don't have an expectation that the imagery will be as good looking as it is at freezing. If I'm looking at buildings, most will be somewhat warmer than air temperature but it can still be challenging to get an image that doesn't look noisy—it comes with the territory! 

    I hope this information helps folks as they are considering a cold weather system. My basic suggestion is that, with regard to cold weather operation, most of us have little to worry about most of the time even if all the images may not always be pretty. 



    Thermally Yours,

    John
    ASNT NDT Level III #48166
    The Snell Group
    www.thesnellgroup.com
    www.thermalsolutions.org
    800-636-9820
  •  03-08-2010, 8:21 AM 4323 in reply to 4322

    Re: Cold weather specifications

    John, thank you for a very timely post. 

    My imager(s) serve a cold temperature application so the issue of operating envelope has been near and dear to my heart.  It is fascinating, if not a bit confusing, for me to hear the various concerns and recommendations on how to prepare the imager for the work and how to avoid error. 

     One of the areas where I've had some conflicting guidance , including from reps within the same company, has been the management of error caused by the imager being substantially warmer than the outside air temperature and subject of the shot.  To deal with this, one suggestion passed my way was to leave the imager on, uninsulated, in the conditions and let it autocalibrate as it cooled.  I wasn't comfortable with this approach so took a compromise approach of insulating the imager somewhat, but leaving it on for 5 minutes or so, then using it for as long as we ourselves could stand the conditions (typically half an hour).  While I didn't see much noise doing this, I did have some questions about just how sensitive this imager was with the conditions.

    While I appreciate that every imager design is different, and so these errors and their mitigations would vary, are there any general words of wisdom you can share on managing an imager that is necessarily kept warmer than OAT and target?

    Thanks again

    -John

     

  •  03-08-2010, 5:28 PM 4334 in reply to 4323

    Re: Cold weather specifications

    I was hoping you'd chime in on this one as I know you have considerable cold weather experience. My suggestion, given your needs for accuracy at colder temperatures, would be to include a blackbody reference. preferably calibrated and traceable, in the field of view whenever possible. You can then always use that to check what is really true!


    Thermally Yours,

    John
    ASNT NDT Level III #48166
    The Snell Group
    www.thesnellgroup.com
    www.thermalsolutions.org
    800-636-9820
View as RSS news feed in XML

Live Webcasts, On-Demand Webinars, Online Learning